[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should this be this way?
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: Should this be this way? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:50:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
POSIX specifies the behavior of a shell. This tells Chet how he has to
make Bash behave (with some leeway). There are all kinds of silly little
details and ambiguities that Chet has to worry about.
However, YOU as a shell script writer do not have to worry about all
that crap. All you have to do is put the proper shebang line in your
script, and then -- like magic! -- your script will be executed using
the interpreter you specified.
End of problem.
- Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?, DJ Mills, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?, DJ Mills, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chris Down, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?,
Greg Wooledge <=
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Greg Wooledge, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/27
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chris Down, 2013/02/27
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 2013/02/28
- Re: Should this be this way?, Bob Proulx, 2013/02/28
- Re: Should this be this way?, Andreas Schwab, 2013/02/28
- Re: Should this be this way?, Pierre Gaston, 2013/02/28
- Re: Should this be this way?, Sven Mascheck, 2013/02/28
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/28