[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a recursion bug
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: a recursion bug |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:40:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 05:07:16AM +0000, Yuxiang Cao wrote:
> Hi,
> After second thought, I carefully read the bash manual page and find this
> information. Functions may be recursive. The FUNCNEST variable may be used to
> limit the depth of the function call stack and restrict the number of
> function invocations. By default, no limit is placed on the number of
> recursive calls. So in my example, what I think I can do is to limit the
> times of recursive calls. So I simply export FUNCNEST variable as " export
> FUNCNEST=500", however, it doesn't work. That could be a bug for bash, right?
It would help if you show what you're doing and what the result is.
It seems to work correctly here:
imadev:~$ bash-4.2.28 -c 'FUNCNEST=100; a() { echo "$1"; a $(($1+1)); }; a 1'
2>&1 | tail
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
bash-4.2.28: a: maximum function nesting level exceeded (100)
Without the FUNCNEST, it runs for several seconds, and then:
imadev:~$ bash-4.2.28 -c 'a() { echo "$1"; a $(($1+1)); }; a 1' 2>&1 | tail
Pid 4466 received a SIGSEGV for stack growth failure.
Possible causes: insufficient memory or swap space,
or stack size exceeded maxssiz.
6534
6535
6536
6537
6538
6539
6540
6541
6542
6543
imadev:~$ ls -l core
-rw------- 1 wooledg pgmr 19908052 Oct 3 08:38 core
imadev:~$ file core
core: core file from 'bash-4.2.28' - received SIGSEGV
(Happy, Linda?)
- Re: a recursion bug, (continued)
- Re: a recursion bug, Linda A. Walsh, 2012/10/03
- Re: a recursion bug, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/03
- Re: a recursion bug, Greg Wooledge, 2012/10/03
- Re: a recursion bug, Chet Ramey, 2012/10/03
- Re: a recursion bug, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/03
- Re: a recursion bug, Chet Ramey, 2012/10/04
- Re: a recursion bug, Dan Douglas, 2012/10/04
- Re: a recursion bug, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/03
- Re: a recursion bug, Eric Blake, 2012/10/03
RE: a recursion bug, Yuxiang Cao, 2012/10/03
- Re: a recursion bug,
Greg Wooledge <=
Re: a recursion bug, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/02
Re: a recursion bug, Greg Wooledge, 2012/10/03