[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers
From: |
Jon Seymour |
Subject: |
Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:02:18 +1000 |
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> wrote:
>
> People sometimes read the POSIX standard today and think it is a
> design document. Let me correct that misunderstanding. It is not.
> POSIX is an operating system non-proliferation treaty.
Love it!
jon.
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, (continued)
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, Chet Ramey, 2011/08/07
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, Eric Blake, 2011/08/08
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, Linda Walsh, 2011/08/08
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, Chet Ramey, 2011/08/08
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, Mike Frysinger, 2011/08/08
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, Chet Ramey, 2011/08/08
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, Linda Walsh, 2011/08/08
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, Eric Blake, 2011/08/09
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, Chet Ramey, 2011/08/09
- Message not available
- Re: bug: return doesn't accept negative numbers, Stephane CHAZELAS, 2011/08/11