bug#13588: Pax hangs in case big UID

[Petr Hracek]

Hello Stefano,

in order to help you with that bug I have prepared patch for that issue:

diff --git a/m4/tar.m4 b/m4/tar.m4
index ec8c83e..87477f1 100644
--- a/m4/tar.m4
+++ b/m4/tar.m4
@@ -81,6 +81,27 @@ do
   AM_RUN_LOG([tardir=conftest.dir && eval $am__tar_ >conftest.tar])
   rm -rf conftest.dir
   if test -s conftest.tar; then
+    AC_CHECK_PROG([ID_TEST], id, [yes], [no])
+    if test x"$ID_TEST" = x"yes"; then
+      if test x"$1" = x"ustar" ; then
+         user_id=`id -u`
+         if test $? -eq 0; then
+           # Maximum allowed UID in case ustar format is 2097151.
+           if test $user_id -ge 2097152; then
+             AC_MSG_ERROR([The uid is big and not allowed in case of 
ustar format. Change format in configure.ac],[2])
+             exit 1
+           fi
+         fi
+         group_id=`id -g`
+         if test $? -eq 0; then
+           # Maximum allowed GID in case ustar format is 2097151
+           if test $group_id -ge 2097152; then
+             AC_MSG_ERROR([The gid is big and not allowed in case of 
ustar format. Change format in configure.ac],[2])
+             exit 1
+           fi
+         fi
+      fi
+    fi
     AM_RUN_LOG([$am__untar <conftest.tar])
     grep GrepMe conftest.dir/file >/dev/null 2>&1 && break
   fi

I would like to help you so that all issues like style, commit 
message,will be properly set.
If you agree I will commit that patch in accordance GNU coding style and 
HACKING file.

Best regards
Petr
On 02/05/2013 02:51 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Hi Peter and Petr (no typo :-)
>
> FYI, this patch is on my radar, and I intend to consider it (and
> likely integrate and adjusted version of it) in the upcoming minor
> version of Automake (1.13.2).
>
> If you want to speed things up a bit and make the integration
> work easier to us, you can present the patch as the output of
> "git format-patch" rather than of "git diff", and add a clear
> git commit message that explains the rationale and motivation
> for the change.  That would be appreciated.
>
> On 02/05/2013 01:42 PM, Petr Hracek wrote:
> > Hello Peter,
> >
> > no problem, I will wait.
> > AC_SUBST is used for one place instance of the variable
> > so that we will modify (in future) only one row instead of several.
> I don't understand this rationale; and I agree with Peter that the
> AC_SUBST call on AM_BIG_ID is unneeded; this should be just a shell
> variable (and since it is used only internally by the automake
> generated code, it should likely be renamed to something like
> 'am_big_id', or even '_am_big_id'.
>
> There are other issues too, but I'll get to them when I'll do a proper
> review.
>
> > I hope that this is not too much general.
> >
> > BR
> > Petr
> Thanks,
>    Stefano

--
S pozdravem / Best regards

Petr Hracek

Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
BaseOS Core Services Brno

Email: address@hidden
Web: www.cz.redhat.com