[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] indexing precedence
From: |
enztec |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] indexing precedence |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:52:33 -0700 |
not even 3[1] is good of even (3)[1] it has to be (,3)l1] it has
to be an ARRAY so the index can work
if this behavior is changed to do what apl2 has then this is no longer apl -
remember apl goes right to left
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:44:18 -0600
Xiao-Yong Jin <address@hidden> wrote:
> ISO/IEC 13751:2000(E) disagrees.
> On page 158, section 10.2.14 Indexed Reference,
> there is an example
> 1 2 3[2]
> 2
>
> > On Feb 15, 2017, at 2:22 PM, Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Xiao-Yong,
> >
> > IBM APL2.
> >
> > [] binds stronger than anything else.
> >
> > Thus 3[1 2] is evaluated first, giving the RANK ERROR.
> >
> > /// Jürgen
> >
> >
> > On 02/15/2017 09:14 PM, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
> >> Feature or bug?
> >>
> >> 1 2 3[2 1 3]
> >> RANK ERROR
> >> 1 2 3[2 1 3]
> >> ^^
> >> )sic
> >> (1 2 3)[2 1 3]
> >> 2 1 3
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>