Re: [Bug-apl] Feature suggestion: multiple function arguments

[Elias Mårtenson]

On 15 March 2016 at 22:47, Jay Foad <address@hidden> wrote:

On 15 March 2016 at 13:24, Elias Mårtenson <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 15 March 2016 at 21:14, Jay Foad <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>       1 2 /¨ 3 4 ⍝ in APL2 this parses as (1 2 /)¨ 3 4
>>  3 3 3  4 4 4
>
> Are you saying that (1 2 /)¨ 3 4 is syntactically correct in APL2?

Yes. / is an operator, so 1 2/ is a derived function, and you can
parenthesise any function-valued _expression_.

So is the SYNTAX ERROR from GNU APL here a bug then?