[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong
From: |
Jay Foad |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:52:50 +0100 |
> So the only benefit of the GNU APL approach is that it
> allows the definition of niladic functions by assigning from a lambda.
I don't understand. You can't use assignment to name a niladic lambda
in GNU APL, because it will be evaluated before the assignment
happens:
f←{1⊣⎕←2}
2
f
1
⎕NC'f' ⍝ it's an array, not a function
2
Jay.
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Jay Foad, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Jay Foad, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong,
Jay Foad <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Jay Foad, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Jay Foad, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/08
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/08