[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong
From: |
Jay Foad |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:00:45 +0100 |
On 6 August 2014 14:15, Elias Mårtenson <address@hidden> wrote:
> My suggestion is that niladic lambda functions will not be allowed at all.
> Instead, they will be interpreted as monadic functions that ignore their
> argument.
That's consistent with the behaviour of Dyalog.
Jay.
- [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, David B. Lamkins, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/05
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong,
Jay Foad <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Jay Foad, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Jay Foad, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Jay Foad, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/08/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] This looks wrong, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/08/07