|
From: | Juergen Sauermann |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-apl] FILE_IO library |
Date: | Thu, 31 Jul 2014 18:19:52 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130330 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
Hi Elias,
the standard Doxygen way would be ⍝⍝< I believe. But I doubt that we will get Doxygen support for APL unless we contribute it ourselves (their wishlist is somewhat lengthy and APL is most likely not on their top-10 list). Another way would be to define our own marker and then translate that to a language that Doxygen understands. Because ⍝⍝< looks a bit odd I would propose ⍝⍝ instead. So we could write an APL function like this: ∇Z←foo B ⍝⍝ foo returns B Z←B ∇ And when it comes to Doxygen we could output it in Doxygen C syntax like this: /** foo returns B Z←B **/ foo(Z, A, B); // fake C function declaration This approach would have some limitations compared to direct APL support. But some things that I find useful such as call and caller graphs should work. /// Jürgen On 07/31/2014 05:38 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |