[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] Shared memory removed
From: |
David B. Lamkins |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] Shared memory removed |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 10:31:06 -0700 |
Something like that would be helpful, yes.
What did you have in mind? A variant of the gnu-apl function that
prompts for options?
On Sun, 2014-06-29 at 01:18 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> Should I add an extra feature to allow you to configure extra options
> for a given session?
>
>
> Regards,
> Elias
>
>
> On 29 June 2014 01:14, David B. Lamkins <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-06-28 at 14:13 +0200, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> I also doubt that anybody is using shared variables at all
> because I
> haven't received any trouble reports on them.
> >
> > /// Jürgen
> >
>
>
> That's true in my case.
>
> Earlier this week I did make a first attempt to understand how
> SVs work.
>
> In the short term I'll need to construct a workflow that lets
> me do more
> than trivial experiments with SVs. I rely on Elias'
> gnu-apl-mode for APL
> input. To work with SVs I'll need to patch gnu-apl-mode to
> provide for
> additional command-line options (so I can pass --SV --id # to
> GNU APL).
> Or something... It seems inelegant to have to customize each
> running
> instance of Emacs to set up an id.
>
> At this point, I don't have any definite plans for SVs beyond
> experimentation to help me understand the strengths and
> weaknesses of
> the approach.
>
>
>
>
>
>