Re: [Bug-apl] Commands made executable

[Juergen Sauermann]

Hi David,

thanks, fixed in SVN 323.

/// Jürgen


On 06/11/2014 07:10 PM, David Lamkins wrote:
> That's a nice addition. We get the benefits of access to session 
> commands without a bunch of new quad-foos.
>
> I don't really care one way or the other about providing access to 
> usercmds. One the one hand, it seems self-consistent to allow this 
> case. On the other hand, it's another extension to IBM/ISO behavior.
>
> I personally don't have an application for `⍎ ']usercmd'`.
>
> That said, I think it'd be nice if errors propagated through the 
> execute. For example,
>
>       ⍎')foo'
>
> doesn't complain about a BAD COMMAND, nor is ⎕EM set.