[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Binding `g' to `bongo-play'
From: |
Daniel Brockman |
Subject: |
Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Binding `g' to `bongo-play' |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:24:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
> Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I think playing deserves a better binding than `C-c RET'.
>> Now that `g' is free, what about binding it to `bongo-play'?
>
> How about `o'? (For "open" or someting.) Not that `g' is
> particularly bad, I'm just throwing the idea out.
I've been meaning to use `o' for opening buffers.
For example, `% m foo RET o' would open a buffer with
all the tracks matching `foo'.
Just `o' by itself would open an empty buffer.
>> When browsing around using `p' and `n', it is a minor pain to
>> have to reach for `RET' (even `C-m' is a teeny-weeny pain).
>
> I hope you're not considering removing the `RET' binding.
No, of course not. :-)
> Daniel, have you been using vi lately? This worries me.
Again, of course not!
It's not so much that `C-m' is hard to type, it's more the
fact that lots of other commands are _easier_ to type, and
that seems wrong, because playing is, like, what Bongo does.
You know? :-)
--
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden>
- [bongo-devel] Binding `g' to `bongo-play', Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/08
- [bongo-devel] Re: Binding `g' to `bongo-play', Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Binding `g' to `bongo-play',
Daniel Brockman <=
- [bongo-devel] Re: Binding `g' to `bongo-play', Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Dired-like binding of `!' (was: Re: Binding `g' to `bongo-play'), Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Dired-like binding of `!', Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Dired-like binding of `!', Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/10
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Dired-like binding of `!', Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/10