[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks
From: |
Daniel Brockman |
Subject: |
Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:54:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
> Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> The `* *' command toggles between a set of marks and the
>>> empty set of marks. [...]
>>
>> I implemented this.
>
> Looks nice, though I haven't done any extensive testing.
>
> When you kill marked tracks, `bongo-toggle-marking' does not
> know about it. It should, otherwise weird things might happen.
Good catch. I'll install a fix.
> I am a little confused with `bongo-unmark-all'. Is it
> really a good thing that it does not store a marking?
I don't know --- maybe not. How about renaming it to
`bongo-kill-marking' and moving it to `* k'? Then we
can add `* y' and `* w' and move to a stack if needed.
--
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden>
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/03
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/04
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks,
Daniel Brockman <=
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/04
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/04
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/04
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/06
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/06
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/06
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/04/06
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/06