Re: RFC: rename parser_class_name as api.parser.class

[Akim Demaille]

> Le 2 janv. 2019 à 08:13, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> We've never finished cleaning up the muscle names.  If D really makes it into 
> Bison, it would be sad that they use such inconsistent names, so let's finish 
> this soon.
> 
> I'm not very happy with api.parser.class, if someone has a better idea, 
> please step forward!  I have avoided api.parser.type, because api.value.type 
> and api.location.type are not about declaring a type, but using a type.  I 
> think that api.parser.class.name is too long.  But we do have 
> api.value.union.name already.
> 
> So api.parser.class.name could be better, but I'd be happy to have opinions.

Installed.