[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new pacification suggestion?
|
From: |
Hans Åberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: new pacification suggestion? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:06:32 +0100 |
> On 20 Nov 2018, at 21:32, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 11/20/18 12:01 PM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> - if (false)
>> + if ((false))
>
> This goes too far. If clang is warning about this sort of thing, then we
> should disable that clang warning. Again, compilers should be our servants,
> not our masters.
That seems a good idea. One I disabled is Clang enforcing the limited logical
expression precedence levels of Pascal, forcing the use of unneeded extra
parentheses.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wlogical-op-parentheses