Re: symbol declarations after rules

[Paul Eggert]

"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:

> Just to make sure I'm being clear: before the first %union, a prologue 
> block would have the same function as %before-header does anywhere.  
> After that %union, a prologue block would have the same function as 
> %after-header does anywhere.

I'm a bit lost.  But I guess you're saying we'd have the following
types of code blocks (other than rule actions)

%union
%{
%before-header
%after-header
%before-definitions
%after-definitions
%% (after rules)

and, except for %%, you can jumble things up any which way, but the
output order will always be -- what?

Sorry, but this is all still sounding pretty complicated.  Can't we
simplify it somehow?