Re: [Axiom-legal] Licensing Aldor

[Jay Belanger]

"Bill Page" <address@hidden> writes:
...
>> it must be assumed that this omission was intentional until
>> proven otherwise.
>
> Yes, of course it was intentional. A plausible reason for this
> in spite of the existence of the Aldor Public License and that
> Aldor is freely and publicly available in binary format is the
> desire to control the official source. Unfortunately aldor.org
> did not seem to realize that such control kills almost all desire
> for innovation on the part of others.

Or even kills the ability to use it.  I'm running GNU/Linux with glibc
2.4; that isn't one of the four OSs that Aldor runs on.  Unless I
downgrade the software on my computer, I can't use Aldor.

Jay