[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] [axiom-developer] What do diagrams in bookvol10.3
Re: [Axiom-developer] [axiom-developer] What do diagrams in bookvol10.3 mean?
Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:05:20 +0200
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:184.108.40.206) Gecko/20110831 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.13
Besides, in my opinion (it is only my opinion, but still it is opinion
of newcomer) HyperDoc documentaion is structured in non-standard fasion,
which makes it not so easy to use at the beginning.
It's not just your opinion. But there is currently not enough manpower
to treat every aspect of this big system. And if you look at the
sources, you'll find that they are written in hypertex, which is close
to tex, but has some hyperlinking features. There is no browser version
since someone would have to translate (or automatically convert) the
hypertex sources into html. Furthermore some of the sources, in
particular the API descriptions are written in the source code itself as
++ comments. These are currently automatically extracted from the code
and made available to HyperDoc.
As for help, there is probably currently only HyperDoc and some friendly
developers on the mailing list(s). I almost never use the )show, )what
etc. commands but do all with hyperdoc.
so it is ok. But it is structured in not so obvious way. Why AXIOM book
is in Reference secion? And why Reference->Language do not contain
description of creation of Domains, Packages and Categories? Where in
reference compiler is described? Why Examples anre in Reference section?
etc... All those things confuses for the first time significantly. Lack
of formal syntax reference, collected in one place is either makes
There are a few questions like "lack of formal syntax reference" that
are not yet answered fully. Nobody has written a document about this (at
least not to my knowledge). The closest thing you can find is the Aldor
Please, do not think, that I'm ungreatful man. Actually, I understand,
that great efforts was made to develop axiom system (and its help in
particular). I think, that axiom is really wonderfull (it is the only
CAS I know, which has strict typing and syntax similar to haskell...
although I did not try Reduce). I like it very much and I only hope,
that things, that I've told above will help make Axiom even better and
easier for newcomers to adopt, so more people will start working with it.
No problem. But the thing is, that even *you* can help. Posing such
questions, suggesting improvements, etc. Be concrete, take your time and
dig into the source code, ask other developers if you get stuck, provide
patches. Axiom will not becoming better over night. More people are needed.
(that's why I was wondering about diagrams, as I thought they could help
me to build hierarchies of Domains of categories - diagram given on the
axiom-developers.org <http://axiom-developers.org> is too big to be usable).
There are two quite usable diagrams in the original Axiom book by
Jenks&Sutor. I don't however know whether these (smaller) hierarchies
exist somewhere in the net.
At the moment I think, that I will generate CartesianTensor(1, 3,
Expression Integer) of required rank, ...
If some one can give some hints about what can be used in solution of
this problem, I would really appreciate it.
Open up a sandbox on http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org, i.e. create,
for example, the page
http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/SandBoxTensorWithSymmetry and put
your initial commands there. Perhaps, someone might help you in entering
the right commands. Of course, you have to clearly describe you
mathematical problem, i.e. what is input and what do you want to obtain
in the end.
Re: [Axiom-developer] [axiom-developer] What do diagrams in bookvol10.3 mean?, daly, 2011/09/22