[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues
From: |
Martin Rubey |
Subject: |
[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues |
Date: |
14 Dec 2007 06:42:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
Bill, Gaby,
> > I guess the simplest solution is to replace the "status" categories
> > as follows:
> >
> > open ... open in all versions
> > closed ... closed in all versions
> >
> > closed in FriCAS
> > closed in OpenAxiom
> > closed in Axiom
> >
> > open in FriCAS --- closed in Axiom and OpenAxiom
> > open in OpenAxiom
> > open in Axiom
> >
> > many of the others are not needed or could be merged:
> >
> > assigned, revised, postponed -> not needed
> >
> > pending, planned, testing -> merge with fix proposed
> >
> > not reproducible, need more info -> merge
> >
> > I think that would be much better organized.
> >
>
> I am not against revising the status categories so they are more
> specific and better organized but I do think it is essential that we
> treat all versions/forks of Axiom on an equal footing on the
> NewSynthesis Axiom Wiki. Doing things the way you suggest does not
> seem sufficiently equitable to me.
Sorry, I can't see: which version of axiom would be preferred by the proposal
above?
Martin
- [Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues, Bill Page, 2007/12/12
- [Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues, Martin Rubey, 2007/12/28
- [Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues, Bill Page, 2007/12/28
- [Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues, Martin Rubey, 2007/12/28
- [Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues, Martin Rubey, 2007/12/28
[Axiom-developer] Re: Close Issues -> Close Fricas Issues, Martin Rubey, 2007/12/14