Re: [Axiom-developer] Latex and axiom.sty.tex

[Ralf Hemmecke]

I don't think that this is a problem with TEXINPUTS. \usepackage finally 
uses \include to get the file into memory. \input however, appends 
".tex" by default.

I think axiom.sty.tex should never be generated. How did you get that 
file anyway? Ah... I see that build-improvements/src/scripts/document.in 
seems to generate it.

Actually, I ran into a similar problem with ALLPROSE. All files look 
like FILE.nw. My first try was

notangle FILE.nw > FILE
noweave FILE.nw > FILE.tex

But exactly for the reason of .sty files, I've changed my mind and now say

noweave FILE.nw > FILE.nw.tex

Maybe that could be a suggestion for Axiom. The .tex files are generated 
anyway so their name does not matter.

Ralf

On 10/24/2006 07:29 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > Waldek Hebisch <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > | There is a problem running Latex in a directory where axiom.sty.tex
> > | is present: Latex seeing '\usepackage{axiom}' picks 'axiom.sty.tex'
> > | from current directory and bombs seeing duplicate '\documentclass'.
> > | 
> > | This affects running Latex in src/doc directory.
> >
> > I usually do out of source build so I don't see this problem.  Thanks
> > for the notice.
>
> This affect also out of source build: both 'document' and 'latex' are
> run in src/doc subdirectory of build directory. 'document' creates
> 'axiom.sty.tex' and 'latex' sees it. 
>
> The problem may depend on default setting of TEXINPUTS, I have Latex
> intallation from Debian 'texlive-full' package (with default settings).