[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex
From: |
Bill Page |
Subject: |
RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:23:30 -0400 |
I think we should ask Norman Ramsey about this "name mangling".
Does it have a nice solution that would allow us to use
the version(s) of noweb distributed by Debian?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Waldek Hebisch [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: October 22, 2006 11:01 AM
> To: Bill Page
> Cc: address@hidden; 'Waldek Hebisch';
> 'address@hidden; address@hidden; Reis'
> Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex
>
>
> Bill Page wrote:
> > On October 22, 2006 9:39 AM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > >
> > > For example latex run on src/hyper/parse_aux.tex gives the
> > > following errors (I removedother messages which are caused by
> > > the two errors):
> > >
> > > ! Missing $ inserted.
> > > <inserted text>
> > > $
> > > l.13 ...aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parse_
> > >
> > > aux.h}\endmoddef\nwstartde...
> > > ...
> >
> > On October 22, 2006 10:04 AM I wrote:
> > >
> > > I do not get any errors in files containing _ in either Tim's
> > > version distributed with Gold nor with a more recent unmodified
> > > version of noweb (noweb-2.11b).
> > >
> >
> > In contrast to the output which Waldek shows, in both versions
> > of noweb run on axiom-developer.org the _ is removed from the
> > generated noweb commands.\:
> >
> > \section{parse\_aux.h}
> >
> \nwfilename{parse_aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parseaux
> .h}\endmoddef
> > \LA{}license\RA{}
> >
> > -----
> >
> > Could this be a LOCALE/LANG issue? Or is this behaviour specific
> > to the version of noweb distributed by Debian?
> >
>
> On 32-bit Debian Sarge with "nowebm 2.10c-3.2" I get the output you
> show. But on 64-bit Debian testing/unstable using "nowebm 2.10c-3.3"
> I get:
>
> \section{parse\_aux.h}
> \nwfilename{parse_aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parse_au
> x.h}\endmoddef\nwstartdeflinemarkup\nwenddeflinemarkup
> \LA{}license\RA{}
>
>
> Note that strictly speaking both forms are problematic: the
> first mangles
> names, the second passes naked underscore to latex (maybe the
> intention
> was to update '\moddef' so that it can handle underscores).
>
> --
> Waldek Hebisch
> address@hidden
>
>
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/21
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex,
Bill Page <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Norman Ramsey, 2006/10/22
RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Norman Ramsey, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22