Re: [Axiom-developer] boottocl

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

"Bill Page" <address@hidden> writes:

| On September 30, 2006 9:29 PM Gabriel Dos Reis asked:
| > 
| > there exist two implementations of boottran::boottocl:
| >   1. one in interp/util.lisp,
| >   2. and on in boot/ptyout.boot.
| > 
| > Which one is the real boottocl compiled into the Boot
| > translator?
| > 
| 
| As Jurgen Weiss has pointed out, bootsys is technically
| superfluous. The boot translator is include in interp as part
| of SPAD. And Axiom can be bootstrapped directly from the
| version of boot in interp. (This is the method that he used
| for the CMUCL version of Axiom.)

all that is interesting but does not address my real issue.

Assume I have an issue with how boottocl works, which version am I
supposed to modify?  I'm talking of the system as it currently is --
now how it could theoretically be.

-- Gaby