[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Axiom-developer] [#138 asin(complex(1.0,0.0))]
From: |
kratt6 |
Subject: |
[Axiom-developer] [#138 asin(complex(1.0,0.0))] |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Apr 2005 03:21:46 -0600 |
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/138AsinComplex1000/diff
--
I believe furthermore, that the problem with 'argument' as described in bug #47
will persist if we fix it this way.
I think that a lot of care has to be taken if we use Lisp functions instead of
"homegrown" ones.
Concerning the place of discussion: I too think that it would be better to:
- ask on axiom-developer whether it is really an issue, if this is not clear
- signal the issue on IssueTracker
- discuss it on axiom-developer
- add proposed fixes on IssueTracker.
Since any change on IssueTracker will notify axiom-developer, there is no
danger of missing anything.
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/address@hidden
- [Axiom-developer] [#138 asin(complex(1.0,0.0))], unknown, 2005/04/01
- [Axiom-developer] [#138 asin(complex(1.0,0.0))], unknown, 2005/04/01
- [Axiom-developer] [#138 asin(complex(1.0,0.0))], kratt6, 2005/04/02
- [Axiom-developer] [#138 asin(complex(1.0,0.0))], kratt6, 2005/04/02
- [Axiom-developer] [#138 asin(complex(1.0,0.0))],
kratt6 <=
- [Axiom-developer] [#138 asin(complex(1.0,0.0))], kratt6, 2005/04/02
- [Axiom-developer] [#138 asin(complex(1.0,0.0))], kratt6, 2005/04/02