Re: [avrdude-dev] AVR109

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Enoch wrote:

> Regarding r1205, incidently I just finished fixing butterfly.c as well :-)
> My patch is at: http://pastebin.com/CfP5iK9q

Please don't use pastebin for that.  Best is always to open a
patch tracker, or maybe a bug tracker (if it's really a bug).
After all, savannah is *our* project infrastructure, so there's
no point to involve some third-party commercial site, including
a lot of Javascript stuff.

It's also possible to just attach patchs to emails to the list,
but that risks of them being eventually forgotten.

> Flash addresses in the AVR109 protocol are of-course word based.

All this is supposed to be fixed in SVN now, both for AVR109 as
well as AVR910.

> I also
> skip setting the address if AVRBOOT has the self increment feature.

As I wrote in the comment to bug #38952, I don't think it really gains
much to track state between page read/write invocations.

Auto-increment has certainly been a big improvement back in the old
days when each byte (or word) was written separately.  But with paged
memory access, it's almost obsolete.

-- 
cheers, Joerg               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)