[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature?
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature? |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:38:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
As Jason Pepas wrote:
> I recently tried programming a "boarduino" (ie, an atmega168), and I
> got an error message from avrdude which stated that the expected
> device signature was 0x1e9406, and the actual device signature was
> 0x1e9407.
0x1e9407 would be an ATmega165 or ATmega165P. This is a TQFP-64
device, rather than the TQFP-32 of the ATmega168. Are you sure about
the '168?
Strange though that we never added support for the 165 family. I
opened a bug report for it so we don't forget about it by the next
release.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature?, Jason Pepas, 2007/11/02
- Re: [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature?,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature?, Jason Pepas, 2007/11/02
- Re: [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature?, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/11/02
- Re: [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature?, limor, 2007/11/02
- Re: [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature?, Jason Pepas, 2007/11/02
- Re: [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature?, Jason Pepas, 2007/11/05
- Re: [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature?, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/11/05
- Re: [avrdude-dev] new atmega168 device signature?, limor, 2007/11/05