SV: [avrdude-dev] avrdude: stk500_getsync error message

[Peter Warlich]

Hi,

i tested the avrdude.exe (2004-02-10)but with the same result
as before.

/Peter

> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: Martin Thomas [mailto:address@hidden
> Skickat: den 9 juni 2004 16:25
> Till: E. Weddington; Peter Warlich; address@hidden
> Ämne: Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude: stk500_getsync error message
>
>
> > Oh, foo.
> >
> > You are absolutely correct. I originally *wanted* to put in the 0.4
> version
> > because I was a little unsure about the "exact timing"
> version because it
> > hadn't been tested thoroughly. I guess I had gotten mixed
> up and put the
> wrong
> > version in the 20040404 release.
> >
> > I guess now the question would be: could the "exact timing"
> feature have
> > anything to do with this problem?
> >
>
> I do not think so, although it might be. But since I can not
> reproduce the
> problem here and the OT (Peter) sees it only on one maschine we may
> wait for other reports to get more information. "Exact timing" is more
> importent with PPIs with serial-port-protocol-interfaces the
> delay loop
> is only used in the context of the AVR-ISP/SPI programming.
>
> Peter: You may try the fuse-programming-procedure with the 0.4
> Version of avrdude-w32 avail. on
> www.siwawi.arubi.uni-kl.de/avr_projects
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 8 Jun 2004 at 19:23, Martin Thomas wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > I could not reproduce your problem here.
> > > > > Setup: STK500 (same HW and FW-Versions), ATmega16,
> > > > > avrdude-"W32 0.5" (same as in WinAVR 4/04),
> > > >
> > > > Um, that's not completely true.
> > > > WinAVR 20040404 has your (Martin's) "Win32 0.4" version, IIRC.
> > > >
> > > > Eric
> > >
> > > Hmm, sorry for not adding the "subversion" into the output -
> > > well it's "experimental". From my "development-source-tree":
> > > avrdude.exe W32 0.4 Filedate 10.Feb.04 size 121344 bytes
> > > W32 0.5 Filedate 18.Feb.04 size 120832 bytes
> > > date and size of V0.5 are the same as in the bin-dir of the
> > > WinAVR installation here, so it should be 0.5. This may not
> > > be too important, although this would mean the "beta-testers"
> > > are using the "exact timing" version.
> >
>
>