avrdude-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [avrdude-dev] AVR910 Programming speed


From: Bertolt Mildner
Subject: Re[2]: [avrdude-dev] AVR910 Programming speed
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:15:37 +0200

TAR> :) Writeing 5342 Bytes to a AT90S8515 gives me the
TAR> :) following times (erase, write, verify):
TAR> :)
TAR> :) avrdude 3:30
TAR> :) AVR Studio 4 1:10
TAR> :) PonyProg2000 (SI-Prog hardware) 0:30
TAR> :)
TAR> :) Are AVR910 programmers known to be slow in general?
TAR> :) Anyone got an idea why avrdude is 3 times slower that AVR Studio?
TAR> :) Is there any chance to get close to the 0:30 using a AVR910
TAR> :) programmer at all?
TAR> :)
TAR> :)
TAR> :) My environment:
TAR> :) Win2000, P-III 550MHz
TAR> :)
TAR> :) recent CVS snapshot build using Cygwin
TAR> :) command line is "avrdude -c avr910 -P COM2 -p 8515 -e -i test2.hex"
TAR> :)
TAR> :) self built AVR910 programmer using firmware 2.2 or 2.3 from Atmel. Both
TAR> :) minimaly tweaked because I use a AT90S2313 (instead of the AT90S1200)
TAR> :) running at 4MHz.

TAR> I suspect that your firmware supports automatic address increment. The
TAR> firmware I used didn't so I had no idea how to handle it.

Yes, the comments at the beginning of the file indicate that too, but
I can't really prove it as assembler is not my "favorite language". :(

TAR> Without auto incr, avrdude sends 3 extra bytes (cmd + hi + lo bytes).

OK, sounds like a starting point. But can that really triple the
programming time?

TAR> Could you send me a 2.3 firmware if you have it? I didn't have any
TAR> luck with google.

It can be downloaded here: http://www.avr1.org/pavr/software.html


-- 
Best regards,
 Bertolt                            mailto:address@hidden





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]