[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-libc-dev] [bug #44520] time.h mentions a "best effort representatio
From: |
Gregor Riepl |
Subject: |
[avr-libc-dev] [bug #44520] time.h mentions a "best effort representation" but does not explain it |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:20:49 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 Iceweasel/31.5.0 |
URL:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?44520>
Summary: time.h mentions a "best effort representation" but
does not explain it
Project: AVR C Runtime Library
Submitted by: onitake
Submitted on: Thu 12 Mar 2015 03:20:48 PM GMT
Category: Documentation
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Header files
Status: None
Percent Complete: 0%
Assigned to: None
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: Unknown
Fixed Release: None
_______________________________________________________
Details:
This bug report applies to avr-libc 1.8.1.
The documentation for time.h mentions the following:
Section 7.23.2.3 mktime() The standard specifies that mktime() should return
(time_t) -1, if the time cannot be represented. This implementation always
returns a 'best effort' representation.
Please explain what "best effort" means in this context, and also add relevant
information to the documentation of mktime and gm_mktime.
I assume these two functions clamp the value of the returned time_t to
[0,UINT32_MAX], but is that the only limitation?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?44520>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [avr-libc-dev] [bug #44520] time.h mentions a "best effort representation" but does not explain it,
Gregor Riepl <=