Re: [avr-libc-dev] AVR toolset critical issues

[E. Weddington]

Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> As E. Weddington wrote:
>
>  
>
> > > Ted, Joerg, Denis, Marek: You guys have the FSF paperwork in for
> > > either binutils or gcc or both. In my current situation, I can't do
> > > this.
> > >      
>
> While I've got the paperwork signed for binutils, I don't have any
> commit access.  All I've got is the ability to submit something that
> could legally be included (by someone with commit privs).
>
>  

Well, you're further along than I. :-)

> > Ok everybody take a look at this on the GCC list:
> > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00775.html>
> >    
>
> Hmm, 200 regressions against 3.4.  And we even know of a number of
> regressions in 3.4 against 3.3 (for the AVR at least)...
>
>  

Yup. So far I haven't been real happy with the 3.4.x series because of this.
I hope that the future 4.0.x series will be an improvement over 3.4.x, 
but everybody will have to start testing snapshots *now* to get any bugs 
worked out.

Eric