Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #10329] crtm168.o is not being built

[E. Weddington]

Keith Gudger wrote:

> Ted & Eric:
>
> I followed this thread because of a problem I found with avr-libc-1.0.4.
> Hopefully you can tell me I'm all wet, but here's what happened:
>
> I got the avr-libc-1.0.4 tar, and built it.  Afterwords, the avr3, avr4,
> and avr5 directories were no longer in my /usr/avr/lib directory, meaning
> all of those devices were no longer supported.  My version of avr-gcc is:
>
>  
I've been seing some of that here. I haven't yet mentioned it on the 
avr-libc list.

I have a "avr-libc/avr-libc-1.0.4" dir which contains the source. I 
build in the "avr-libc/build" dir. The building process then creates:
avr-libc/avr3
avr-libc/avr4
avr-libc/avr5
that are parallel to the /build directory. I would have expected these 
directories to be under /build.

But the good thing is that everything seems to build and install just 
fine for me. This is one reason why I haven't mentioned this yet. But, I 
could be the oddball here since I build on Cygwin. :-)

> avr-gcc (GCC) 3.3 20030428 (prerelease), which with binutils 2.13 should
> be OK, no?  Thanks.
>
>  
Those versions are probably ok, but you might want to upgrade to a 
*released* version of gcc, perhaps 3.3.2, and go to binutils 2.15. IMHO, 
I would avoid using the 3.4.x series for the AVR target for the time 
being due to regression bugs. Unless you like patching. :-)

Eric