[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc 1.0?
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc 1.0? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 20:38:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
As E. Weddington wrote:
> > > Speaking of installing.... what about installing
> gcrt1.S? I
[Btw., your word wrapping's got a bit worse lately.]
> projects.) (BTW, Don't forget about the malloc bug in the
> list.)
Sure.
> Since we're trying to get AS3 deprecated, it sounds like it
> would be better to not avr-strip -g at all, and put a note
> in the readme on how to do it if using AS3, but recommend
> AS4.
Fine by me.
> (BTW, Any word from your Atmel contacts about the new
> AS4 DLL?).
The last i've heard was that the official (non-beta) AS4
release has been scheduled for 2003/06. Hmm, June's not
yet over. ;-) Still, the web site lists ``Updated 3/03''
as the latest version.
> I'd rather not put the source in a user's project
> directory; ...
Nope, put it into the WinAVR tree. It would be really cool if that's
the exact same directory you're using to compile the entire WinAVR
avr-libc from; since the full pathname is recorded in the object files
(and coff-ext-avr can transport them), that way, AS4 should
automagically pick the sources up from there.
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
- [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc 1.0?, E. Weddington, 2003/06/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc 1.0?, E. Weddington, 2003/06/11
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc 1.0?, eric, 2003/06/12
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc 1.0?, E. Weddington, 2003/06/24
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc 1.0?, E. Weddington, 2003/06/24
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc 1.0?,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc 1.0?, E. Weddington, 2003/06/24