RE: [avr-gcc-list] Optimization Problem?

[Boyapati, Anitha]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: address@hidden
>[mailto:address@hidden On
>Behalf Of larry barello
>Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:31 AM
>To: address@hidden; address@hidden
>Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Optimization Problem?
>
>Strange rcalls are a fast way to allocate four bytes on the stack for a
>local...
>

Thanks for explanation Tom Dean. I have been wondering about this for some time 
although it never struck me as an optimization change.

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/avr-libc-dev/2006-06/msg00027.html
seems to discuss more about this. 


Anitha

>-----Original Message-----
>From: address@hidden [mailto:avr-gcc-
>address@hidden On Behalf Of Thomas D. Dean
>Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:56 AM
>To: address@hidden
>Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Optimization Problem?
>
>On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 11:48 -0800, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
>Sorry, again. I am really doing good with this post.
>
>>avr-gcc --version
>avr-gcc (GCC) 4.3.4
>Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is
>NO
>warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>PURPOSE.
>
>>uname -a
>Linux asus 2.6.32-26-generic-pae #48-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 10:31:20 UTC
>2010 i686 GNU/Linux
>
>tomdean
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AVR-GCC-list mailing list
>address@hidden
>http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AVR-GCC-list mailing list
>address@hidden
>http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list