|
From: | John Regehr |
Subject: | Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR LLVM backend? |
Date: | Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:08:11 -0700 (MST) |
User-agent: | Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) |
Of course they'll want to support PIC on PIC.I know a guy who has a project called SHARC, I suggested that he port it to the SHARC processor...
John On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Dave N6NZ wrote:
Weddington, Eric wrote:-----Original Message-----From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hiddenorg] On Behalf Of John Regehr Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:23 PM To: David Brown Cc: address@hidden Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR LLVM backend?I'm pretty sure this is not an issue (anymore, at least). I could be wrong. The recently-added PIC port of LLVM would be a good place to start looking.Ummm... are you sure they mean PIC as in a processor from Microchip, or do they mean PIC as in Position Independent Code?That particular collision in the acronym name space is a frequent cause of confusion among embedded developers....-daveOh, really?! I didn't know that they supported PIC. How interesting....PIC is of course a particularly evil target. I claim that if it can be supported at all, AVR should be easy :).;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list address@hidden http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |