[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVaRICE and gdb windows port
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVaRICE and gdb windows port |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:02:48 -0700 |
On 20 Feb 2003 at 17:39, David Brown wrote:
> Does anyone know if there are plans to port AVaRICE to windows?
Vague eventual plans, yes.
> I would imagine it would be a fairly simple matter, at least under
> cygwin.
Sometimes the difference between imagination and reality is
astounding. :-)
> avr-gdb is probably already working under windows (I haven't
> tried it yet, since I could not get avarice to compile), given that
> there are lots of other gdb's running under windows.
AFAIK, it isn't working under windows.
> I would like to
> use gdb as an alternative to AVR Studio, since it provides more
> flexible debugging (watching things like structures work properly, and
> has powerful scripting) and would be consistent with my tools for
> other micros (msp430, 68332).
Aye, there's the rub.
You don't use AVaRICE for debugging / simulating per se. AVaRICE is
for In Circuit Emulatation (ICE).
For debugging / simulating you want to use GDB with SimulAVR, which
simulates an AVR device. However, AFAIK SimulAVR is not as advanced
as AVR Studio.
To summarize:
Free debugging / simulating tools for AVR:
1. AVR Studio. Windows only. Use with GCC is buggy (currently).
2. GDB / SimulAVR. Linux only (currently). Simulator.
3. GDB / AVaRICE. Linux only (currently). Used in ICE.
I've heard that other users like VMLAB but I don't know much about
it. But I don't think that it's a free tool. (Corrections, additions
anyone?)
> But at the moment it looks like I would
> have to run avarice on a linux machine and connect to it over the
> network - it would probably work, but it's hardly convenient.
True.
> The latest version of avarice I found on the net is around a year old
> - does this mean it is so complete that there is no need for it, or
> that development has stalled for lack of interest or lack of
> resources?
I thought I heard that it is not being developed as much as it
should. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
Eric
- [avr-gcc-list] New avr-gcc Win32 build guide, Tony Mahar, 2003/02/18
- [avr-gcc-list] AVaRICE and gdb windows port, David Brown, 2003/02/20
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVaRICE and gdb windows port,
E. Weddington <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVaRICE and gdb windows port, Volkmar Dierkes, 2003/02/20
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVaRICE and gdb windows port, David Gay, 2003/02/20
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVaRICE and gdb windows port, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/02/22
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVaRICE and gdb windows port, Marek Michalkiewicz, 2003/02/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVaRICE and gdb windows port, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/02/24
Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVaRICE and gdb windows port, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/02/20