[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread
From: |
Denis Chertykov |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread |
Date: |
Wed Jan 17 09:44:39 2001 |
address@hidden (J Wunsch) writes:
> >> But what about the internal consistency compilation problems i
> >> mentioned? Have they been fixed meanwhile?
> >
> > You don't point to any real bug.
>
> Hmm, maybe. The old compiler used
>
> __tmp_reg__ = r0
>
> while the new one uses
>
> __tmp_reg__ = 0
>
> Does that mean the current version of the assembler understands the
> latter as well as the former as a valid register naming?
Current avr-as understands `__tmp_reg__ = 0' and
(for example) `mov __tmp_reg__, r29'.
> (Actually, there was a bug in my report, regarding the number of
> parameters to REGISTER_MOVE_COST() being inconsistent between the
> machine-dependent .h files and their usage in the machine-independent
> ..c files. But that might have been a temporary one of that particular
> version.)
Show me a code examples and GCC version.
> >> I can't download the full > 10 GB of gcc source code each day, just in
> >> order to check whether it's fixed now.
> >
> > Use CVS. It's really nice.
>
> Well, i know CVS and know it's nice:), we've been using at for FreeBSD
> since 1993... But i don't want to become a gcc developer, and it's
> not all that practical for daily work (in particular not when used as
> remote CVS). I'll give it another try by using one of the snapshot
> tarballs for binutils.
Are you sure than you use a latest binutils (not a 2.10 branch).
Denis.
- [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, Denis Chertykov, 2001/01/08
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, J Wunsch, 2001/01/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, Denis Chertykov, 2001/01/10
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, J Wunsch, 2001/01/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, Denis Chertykov, 2001/01/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, J Wunsch, 2001/01/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread,
Denis Chertykov <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, J Wunsch, 2001/01/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, Denis Chertykov, 2001/01/17