[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: copyright problem with install-sh, request for clean-room rewrite
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: copyright problem with install-sh, request for clean-room rewrite |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Sep 2018 11:35:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:13:13AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
...
> Note that the most recent version of 'install-sh' as installed by Automake
> states:
> # Copyright (C) 1994 X Consortium
looking at my collection of untarred X sources, there's an issue with that:
The comment just before reads something like
# This originates from X11R5 (mit/util/scripts/install.sh), which was
# later released in X11R6 (xc/config/util/install.sh) with the
# following copyright and license.
however -
the first mention of copyright for any version of that file in X
sources was in 2003 (in xterm's sources), citing 1991. xterm has
the 1994 date from autoconf (i.e.,. a secondhand report).
X's sources don't have that file...
The X11R5 file has this comment (no copyright notice):
#
# install - install a program, script, or datafile
#
# $XConsortium: install.sh,v 1.2 89/12/18 14:47:22 jim Exp $
#
# This script is compatible with the BSD install script, but was written
# from scratch.
#
There's an additional twist: Thomas Roell made a script
mit/server/ddx/x386/etc/install.sh derived from the X11R5
mit/util/scripts/install.sh, adding a copyright notice:
# Copyright 1990,91 by Thomas Roell, Dinkelscherben, Germany.
With all that, the available information shows that someone "fixed" things
in the early 2000s by adding a copyright date to address the derived work.
Perhaps autoconf's source repo has additional information.
As is, the copyright was apparently not applied by the owner of the file.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
https://invisible-island.net
ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature