[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: manual: Why use 'maude' as the example program name?
From: |
Mathieu Lirzin |
Subject: |
Re: manual: Why use 'maude' as the example program name? |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:36:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>> "Jonas" == Jonas Thiem <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Jonas> Disclaimer: I haven't read this part of the docs myself. But for what
> Jonas> it's worth, I think Maude looks a bit like a misspelling of Make and
> Jonas> doesn't stick out that well, compared to "exampleprog" or something.
>
> One such section starts:
>
> In the list below, we use the name “maude” to refer to the program or
> library. In your ‘Makefile.am’ you would replace this with the
> canonical name of your program. This list also refers to “maude” as a
> program, but in general the same rules apply for both static and dynamic
> libraries; the documentation below notes situations where programs and
> libraries differ.
>
FWIW, I think using “maude” with the above explanation is clear enough.
--
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37