[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option
From: |
Joseph S. Myers |
Subject: |
Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:24:54 +0000 (UTC) |
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> But this option is going to be deprecated in Automake 1.12.1 and removed in
> Automake 1.13:
>
> <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11034>
That page isn't very helpful since it doesn't give the non-deprecated way
to achieve each part of the effect of "cygnus", if still desired (I think
avoiding info documentation being built in the source directory, so that
builds could use a non-writable source directory, may have been one part).
Is there better transition documentation somewhere?
--
Joseph S. Myers
address@hidden
- Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/28
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option,
Joseph S. Myers <=
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/28
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Ian Lance Taylor, 2012/03/28
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/31
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2012/03/31
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/31
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/31
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/31