[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Augment instead of replace maude_DEPENDENCIES
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Augment instead of replace maude_DEPENDENCIES |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:36:50 +0900 |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> - For programs and libraries, automake now detects
> EXTRA_foo_DEPENDENCIES and
> adds them to the normal list of dependencies, but without
> overwriting the
> foo_DEPENDENCIES variable, which is normally computed by automake.
Hmm, is there a convention about whether to use names like
"EXTRA_foo_DEPENDENCIES" vs. "foo_EXTRA_DEPENDENCIES"?
I would have guessed the latter, as it seems more consistent (and a bit
prettier)...
-Miles
--
Consult, v.i. To seek another's disapproval of a course already decided on.