[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs |
|
Date: |
Sat, 13 Nov 2010 05:50:39 +0900 |
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Stefano Lattarini
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> It might be time to reconsider this decision.
> If we document it, we should at least advise against it IMHO.
... or just give the pros and cons. That seems likely to be more
convincing and less annoying...
-miles
--
Cat is power. Cat is peace.
- AM_V_GEN - better docs, Patrick Rutkowski, 2010/11/12
- Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs, Miles Bader, 2010/11/12
- Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/12
- Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/12
- Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs,
Miles Bader <=
- [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter (was: Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/18
- Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter (was: Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs), Nick Bowler, 2010/11/18
- Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter (was: Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/18
- Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/20
- Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/20
- Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/20
- Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/11/20
Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs, Miles Bader, 2010/11/12