[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ``install -C'' / unnecessarily updating time stamps
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
Re: ``install -C'' / unnecessarily updating time stamps |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:12:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hello!
It's been some time, but still...
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 09:23:15PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Benoit Sigoure <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-10/msg00070.html
>
> I installed the following to Automake install-sh to implement
> "install-sh -C", which is the second part of that patch.
Thank you! I'm already using that one, it works fine.
However now there is another issue, see this snippet:
make[2]: Entering directory `[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build'
test -z "//lib" || /bin/mkdir -p
"[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build.install//lib"
/bin/bash [...]/build-aux/install-sh -C -m 644 'libhurd-ihash.a'
'[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build.install//lib/libhurd-ihash.a'
/bin/bash [...]/build-aux/install-sh -C -m 644 'libhurd-ihash-nomalloc.a'
'[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build.install//lib/libhurd-ihash-nomalloc.a'
i686-pc-viengoos-gnu-ranlib
'[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build.install//lib/libhurd-ihash.a'
i686-pc-viengoos-gnu-ranlib
'[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build.install//lib/libhurd-ihash-nomalloc.a'
I'm using the `-C' option -- but that doesn't help much if Automake
decides to have ranlib tinker with the files afterwards again. Should
this be changed in Automake: to first run ranlib (or whatever else might
be done) on them and then install them?
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: ``install -C'' / unnecessarily updating time stamps,
Thomas Schwinge <=