[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strictness
From: |
Noah Slater |
Subject: |
Re: Strictness |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:40:29 +0100 |
> I disagree. In a centralised VCS sure, you can scale to 100's of commits
> a day - but in a distributed VCS - e.g. bzr, git, hg, monotone ... you
> tend to get 100's of commits on branches, and a much smaller number of
> branch merges occuring - branch merges being the point at which code
> review is done, regression tests run etc. And its entirely appropriate
> to create a human meaningful summary of the aggregate work done on that
> branch.
Actually - this argument doesn't support your conclusion.
In Subversion (as an example) if you were merging branch A to the
trunk after 10 commits you would have one revision entry for the merge
- not the aggregate of all 10. So in this instance the commit message
would be the description of the merge and the ChangeLog would (like I
previously stated) make sense copying this exactly...
... which once again begs the question - why bother?
--
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
- Re: Strictness, (continued)
- Re: Strictness, Noah Slater, 2007/08/11
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Noah Slater, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Noah Slater, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Noah Slater, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Robert Collins, 2007/08/12
- Re: Strictness,
Noah Slater <=
- Re: Strictness, Robert Collins, 2007/08/12
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/12
- Re: Strictness, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/13
- Re: Strictness, Bob Friesenhahn, 2007/08/13
- Re: Strictness, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/14