[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AM_CFLAGS usage
From: |
Norbert Sendetzky |
Subject: |
Re: AM_CFLAGS usage |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:16:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Hi Ralf
> > Norbert Sendetzky wrote:
> > > This works, but as soon as I move AM_CFLAGS to the Makefile.am in the
> > > parent directory, they aren't set any more. Is this the way it was
> > > intended and the only way to set them globally is to AC_SUBST them or
> > > is there something wrong in my files?
>
> Besides the information Marc already gave you, what's wrong with
> globally setting it by AC_SUBSTing? You can still override it per
> Makefile.am.
>
> Note though that
> -Wall -ansi -pedantic
>
> is pretty GCC specific, and will make many other compilers barf
> heavily. So if your package targets portability, it'd be nice
> to allow your users to override these flags (preferably by
> ./configure CFLAGS='...').
How can I do this?
According to the docs, AM_CFLAGS will be overwritten by package specific flags
but not by flags provided by the user.
Thanks
Norbert
--
OpenPGP public key
http://www.linuxnetworks.de/norbert.pubkey.asc
pgpqP7VAMj7Qx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- AM_CFLAGS usage, Norbert Sendetzky, 2006/06/11
- Re: AM_CFLAGS usage, Marc Alff, 2006/06/11
- Re: AM_CFLAGS usage, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/06/12
- Re: AM_CFLAGS usage,
Norbert Sendetzky <=
- Re: AM_CFLAGS usage, Ralf Corsepius, 2006/06/12
- Re: AM_CFLAGS usage, Norbert Sendetzky, 2006/06/12
- Re: AM_CFLAGS usage, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/06/12
- Re: AM_CFLAGS usage, Norbert Sendetzky, 2006/06/12
- Re: AM_CFLAGS usage, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/06/12