Re: ideas for speeding up compile mode

[Peter O'Gorman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
| Hi Ralf,
|
| * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:44:40AM CEST:
|
|>On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 17:06 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
|>
|>>[ CC to automake because it is involved -- see below ]
|>
|>>3) Fold compile mode completely into Automake snippets/the resulting
|>>Makefile.  I wonder why this has not been done before, at least for the
|>>default rules (per-target rules could lead to a large blowup of the
|>>resulting Makefile.in).
|>
|>IIRC, the argument had been that the libtool folks had wanted to "keep
|>libtool outside of automake" because libtool is/had been supposed to be
|>a tool independent of the make infrastructure being used (automake is
|>just one of them).
|
|
| OK.

With keeping current libtool compile mode, automake doing this seems like a
great idea to me.

2 yen.

Peter
- --
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBQoirmbiDAg3OZTLPAQKOGQP8Dyg8Cqljpy0oA+HJJcxRupc1cbDleFiu
khpaLQPnqoKtgVfqZNK3df9mKs4Y8I0KGsjrzv+sHr74igqCM4OEJf4IK2pNVlqs
K8YHaWZ/PO19k0q2TANxGbLRD/UpNvmyyIIX/3EfxVqRfu7jth+LK3Hu8xgOT6XF
Wohs1da3FX8=
=xp1c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----