[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: builddir vs. srcdir
From: |
Paul Pogonyshev |
Subject: |
Re: builddir vs. srcdir |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:27:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Paul" == Paul Pogonyshev <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Paul> Stepan Kasal wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> >> > because the generated sources are placed into the build directory,
> >> > while `make' looks for them in the source directory.
> >>
> >> generally, make should look for them in both places.
>
> Paul> Yes, and it does look in both places, but the dependencies make
> `foo.o' Paul> depend on `$(srcdir)/foo.c',
>
> This could happen if this location was the right one in the
> past, and building foo.c in the build directory is a recent
> change. In that case the dependency file still have the old
> info.
>
> The way to erase dependency info is distclean:
>
> make -k distclean; ./configure; make
Yup, you are right, thanks. Should have guessed myself... >:[
Paul
- builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/09
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/09
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/09
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/10
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/10
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/11
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/12
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/16
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Paul Pogonyshev, 2005/03/18
- Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/21
Re: builddir vs. srcdir, Harald Dunkel, 2005/03/10