[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake & flex's -P option
|
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
|
Subject: |
Re: automake & flex's -P option |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Mar 2003 23:15:07 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Richard" == Richard Dawe <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
Richard> So, back to my original suggestion: Modify the
Richard> automake rules to invoke lex with the -t option and
Richard> pipe the output to $LEX_OUTPUT_FILE. Then the use -P
Richard> or %option prefix will not break the automake
Richard> rule. But how portable is 'lex -t'?
lex -t, if portable, seems attractive to me because it would
allow us to drop ylwrap from the lex rules.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/03
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Akim Demaille, 2003/03/13
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/17
- Re: automake & flex's -P option,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <=
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Akim Demaille, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Earnie Boyd, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/18