[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ultrix and 'missing'?
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: ultrix and 'missing'? |
Date: |
21 May 2001 13:18:30 -0600 |
>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
Akim> Hm, are you sure there are no dependencies between those two
Akim> guys? I don't feel good here. (Checking...) Hm, seems to be
Akim> OK.
I wasn't sure, but I looked and couldn't see any.
Akim> I really don't like having to do that.
Me neither.
Akim> Could the fact that we are using a macro for the dependency be
Akim> responsible? Harlan, what happens if you replace the macro
Akim> invocation with its value?
Yes, that would be better.
Tom
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, (continued)
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/18
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Harlan Stenn, 2001/05/18
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/18
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Harlan Stenn, 2001/05/18
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/19
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Harlan Stenn, 2001/05/19
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Harlan Stenn, 2001/05/19
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/20
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Harlan Stenn, 2001/05/20
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/21
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Harlan Stenn, 2001/05/21
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/24
- Re: ultrix and 'missing'?, Harlan Stenn, 2001/05/18