automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Perl Bug?


From: Pavel Roskin
Subject: Re: Perl Bug?
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:09:18 -0500 (EST)

Hello, Akim!

I'm sorry if I did someting wrong. Everything that I removed didn't look
like legitimate automake messages.

I was debugging another bug and I discovered that I don't understand the
messages produced by "autoreconf --force --verbose", i.e. it was hard to
figure out what program produced what output.

> Automake.  Actually you should also have removed the
>
>         warn 'automake: Autoconf traces is an experimental feature';
>         warn 'automake: use at your own risks';

Nope. "automake: " makes them legitimate.

I'm restoring the "traces:" lines. Sorry.

Regards,
Pavel Roskin

________________________________
--- ChangeLog
+++ ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 2001-02-02  Pavel Roskin  <address@hidden>

+       * automake.in (scan_autoconf_traces): Restore trace messages.
+
        * automake.in (handle_aclocal_m4): Fix stripping of the initial
        "./" from the dependencies of aclocal.m4.
        Reported by Ralf Corsepius.
--- automake.in
+++ automake.in
@@ -4375,6 +4375,7 @@
            # _AC_LIBOBJ_DECL and use it the in various macros.
            if (!defined $libsources{$source})
                {
+                   print STDERR "traces: discovered $source\n";
                    $libsources{$source} = $here;
                }
        }
@@ -4382,6 +4383,7 @@
        {
            if (!defined $configure_vars{$args[0]})
                {
+                   print STDERR "traces: discovered AC_SUBST($args[0])\n";
                    $configure_vars{$args[0]} = $here;
                }
        }
________________________________




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]