[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IMPORTANT] Should I stop flooding the list with patches?
From: |
Jack Kelly |
Subject: |
Re: [IMPORTANT] Should I stop flooding the list with patches? |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:55:29 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden> writes:
> So I ask: do you think it would be worthwhile to curb the quantity
> of patches posted here, by posting only the patches judged worth
> of "general interest"? Or, if that sounds overly "harsh", what
> should I/we do to ensure important changes have more visibility?
I like the situation as it is. I'm an occasional commentator and a very
occasional contributor, so take my opinion with some salt.
It's easier for readers to filter the list in a way that makes sense to
them, because one developer's "deprecation of a misfeature" can easily
become a user's "sudden breaking change". I'm not saying this is done on
purpose, but it's easy for it to accidentally happen.
Perhaps a severity tag in the subject line is the answer?
-- Jack