Re: [PATCH] hacking: document format for git commit messages

[Stefano Lattarini]

On 02/27/2012 04:48 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/26/2012 02:02 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> Do you really want to start requiring a Signed-off-by line, now?
> 
> I don't care either way, but it's slightly less work without.
> 
> I don't care whether you require it, require it to be omitted, or (like
> libvirt) leave it optional; as long as we document _this_ project's
> policy, then people can live by the policy.
> 
Given the rationales seen so far, I think it's better to leave our "git
policy" silent on the "Signed-off" lines.  We can accept patches both
with and without them.

Thanks,
  Stefano